Teachers vs AI: Grading Paper Efficiency
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made significant strides in education, with some educators in grades 3–12 now incorporating AI-powered grading tools into their classrooms. One notable tool gaining traction is Writable, a ChatGPT-powered grading tool acquired by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Designed to streamline the grading process, Writable offers time-saving benefits for teachers by providing AI-generated feedback on student essays.
The use of Writable raises questions about the wisdom of outsourcing critical feedback to machines. While AI grading tools like Writable may offer efficiency gains, there are concerns about the potential drawbacks. Automated grading could lead to shortcuts in providing personalised feedback, diminishing its educational value. Moreover, reliance on AI may reduce teachers’ familiarity with the material they are teaching over time.
Privacy implications also arise from the use of cloud-based AI tools like Writable, as they involve storing and processing student data. Additionally, ChatGPT, the AI behind Writable, is not infallible. It can make errors, misinterpret student work, or provide inaccurate information, raising doubts about its reliability in grading.
Despite these concerns, proponents argue that AI grading tools can free up valuable time for teachers, allowing them to focus on more creative and impactful teaching activities. Writable’s proponents claim that it empowers educators by providing flexibility in allocating time for direct student interaction and personalised teaching.
However, amid discussions about AI’s role in education, there is a divide among parents regarding the use of AI in evaluating students’ academic performance. While some parents are open to AI-assisted grading, others have reservations about its impact on learning outcomes.
Writable is not the only AI-powered grading tool on the market. Others include Crowdmark, Gradescope, and EssayGrader, with McGraw Hill reportedly developing similar technology aimed at enhancing teacher assessment and feedback.
In a related development, New York City Public Schools have blocked access to OpenAI’s ChatGPT AI model on its network and devices due to concerns about negative impacts on student learning. Educators fear that students may misuse ChatGPT to cheat on assignments or inadvertently introduce inaccuracies into their work.
ChatGPT, a large language model created by OpenAI, has garnered attention for its ability to generate human-like text across various subjects. However, it also has limitations, including the potential to produce inaccurate information. NYC education officials cite concerns about the safety and accuracy of content as reasons for restricting access to ChatGPT in schools.
The concerns surrounding AI in education highlight broader issues related to the reliability and trustworthiness of AI-generated content. ChatGPT’s tendency to produce convincing false information raises questions about its suitability as a reliable source of factual information in educational settings.
To understand why AI chatbots like ChatGPT sometimes produce false information, it’s essential to examine how these AI models work. ChatGPT relies on a type of AI called a “large language model” (LLM) trained on millions of text sources to generate responses. However, these models can make mistakes, leading to what researchers refer to as “hallucinations” or “confabulations.”
Confabulations occur when an AI bot generates false information that can mislead or misinform users. ChatGPT’s ability to confabulate stems from its role as a prediction machine, where it fills in gaps in its knowledge with plausible-sounding words based on statistical associations learned during training.
Despite efforts to improve AI models like ChatGPT, challenges remain in ensuring their accuracy and reliability. While techniques like reinforcement learning from human feedback aim to address confabulation issues, they do not guarantee complete elimination of errors.
The debate surrounding AI in education underscores the need for careful consideration of the benefits and limitations of AI-powered tools. While these tools offer potential efficiency gains, concerns about their reliability and impact on student learning require careful consideration. As the use of AI in education continues to evolve, it is essential to strike a balance between leveraging technology to enhance teaching and ensuring that educational practices remain effective and equitable for all students.
for all my daily news and tips on AI, Emerging technologies at the intersection of humans, just sign up for my FREE newsletter at www.robotpigeon.be
